BI & analytics modernization for metrics the board can trust.
Most analytics programs do not fail because teams lack dashboards. They fail because revenue, risk, cost, customer, and operational metrics mean different things in different rooms. We modernize the data foundation, semantic layer, dashboards, and governance model so leaders stop arguing over definitions and start acting on the numbers.
The rebuild of the data, metric, semantic, dashboard, governance, and adoption layers so business reporting becomes consistent, trusted, and usable for decisions.
One number, every room.
What broken analytics looks like
Fix the layer underneath the dashboard so a metric means one thing in every room.
Ranges before you spend a meeting on us.
Analytics Architecture Review
Modernization Program
Analytics-as-a-Service Retainer
Typical first-year investment $380K–$500K. Reconciliation time drops from days to hours within the first quarter. Exact figures are named on the scoping call and written into the SOW.
Modernize the layer, or operate it.
Dashboards exist, but nobody trusts them.
Metrics differ across teams, reconciliation is manual, and the board pack still lives in spreadsheets.
You modernized, and now need ongoing capacity.
The layer is trusted; keeping it trusted needs standing analytics engineering discipline.
Review, modernize, hand over.
Analytics Architecture Review
Data estate and metric audit, semantic-layer gap analysis, and a modernization plan with the SOW for the program.
Modernization Program
Lakehouse foundation; semantic layer with versioned metric definitions, owner attribution, and governance; dashboards rebuilt with enablement; handover.
Hypercare & Handover
Senior engineers on call while executive users adopt the rebuilt dashboards, with the runbook finalized.
Analytics-as-a-Service Retainer
Standing analytics engineering capacity: monthly metric and dashboard delivery, reliability monitoring, quarterly governance review.
Who does the work.
How we build it.
The semantic layer is the work
Dashboards are the visible 10%; the metric logic underneath is what earns trust.
Metrics get named owners
A named steward per metric domain, with a lightweight change process.
Work across BI tools, not against them
Certified vs exploratory metrics; governance applies to decision-grade numbers only.
Open source first where right
Iceberg, Delta Lake, dbt, Airflow; Databricks or Snowflake where you are pre-invested. Lineage and quality run as standing controls with a quarterly governance review.
Open source first where right; your BI tools stay.
Lakehouse / data
Semantic / pipelines
BI
Trusted numbers under regulatory scrutiny.
BFSI
Reconciled risk, capital, and customer metrics with lineage a regulator can follow.
Healthcare
Governed cost, utilization, and quality metrics for payers and health systems.
Public Sector
Program performance and outcome reporting built for transparency and an audit trail.
Usually not, the semantic layer sits beneath your existing tools.
Analytics the business actually trusts, on a semantic layer your team owns.
Bring the number two rooms disagree on. A senior practitioner will map the layer underneath it.